> On a small scale/local level and in situations where information is distributed (like the workplace), democracy is useful and good.
If a company, where decisions are made democratically, is more efficient, then why there seems to be no such companies? If there appeared one, assuming all else equal, would you invest in it?
> Free Thought and Diversity cannot co-exist with dominant institutions of socialization and narrative-production/information-propagation.
I'd say they rather can't exist at all, at least in it's ultimate form and/or stable state.
“Our rulers must admit they are rulers and cease their performative appeals to grievance groups and get on with the actual substance of ruling.”
That will never happen. So it’s much more useful to talk about what the coming chaos and mismanagement looks like and what, if any, opportunities will be presented and how to exploit them.
> On a small scale/local level and in situations where information is distributed (like the workplace), democracy is useful and good.
If a company, where decisions are made democratically, is more efficient, then why there seems to be no such companies? If there appeared one, assuming all else equal, would you invest in it?
> Free Thought and Diversity cannot co-exist with dominant institutions of socialization and narrative-production/information-propagation.
I'd say they rather can't exist at all, at least in it's ultimate form and/or stable state.
Otherwise, good article. Thank you.
“Our rulers must admit they are rulers and cease their performative appeals to grievance groups and get on with the actual substance of ruling.”
That will never happen. So it’s much more useful to talk about what the coming chaos and mismanagement looks like and what, if any, opportunities will be presented and how to exploit them.
What do you think of Yarvin's map?
https://graymirror.substack.com/p/3-descriptive-constitution-of-the