"If we assume that access to the public square (both Physical and Virtual) is good, as I believe it is, then the government has every right to step in and ensure that people have access to that if they want it."
Herein lies the problem. Capitalists, Lol-bertarians, whatever you want to call them; they do not believe that equal access to the Virtual Private Square is "good". They believe in Inequality. Un-equal access to everything material.
"If you ain't got the bling, you can't use the thing."
Not saying I agree with this but this is an important distinction from your completely opposing viewpoint.
Guilty
"If we assume that access to the public square (both Physical and Virtual) is good, as I believe it is, then the government has every right to step in and ensure that people have access to that if they want it."
Herein lies the problem. Capitalists, Lol-bertarians, whatever you want to call them; they do not believe that equal access to the Virtual Private Square is "good". They believe in Inequality. Un-equal access to everything material.
"If you ain't got the bling, you can't use the thing."
Not saying I agree with this but this is an important distinction from your completely opposing viewpoint.